Ex situ program progress

Ex situ program progress


Species		Leiopelma hochstetteri
Region where the program is based		Oceania
The country or countries where this program is based		New Zealand
The authority that recommended this species for an ex situ program		National wildlife conservation authority
Has a genetic analysis been performed on wild populations to define the target taxon, i.e., verify that single, viable Evolutionarily Significant Units (ESU's) that are managed as separate populations, are not confounded by cryptic species or polymorphisms?		Currently underway
If the answer to ESU is No, then there should be an entry for the needs in the Conservation Projects list. This is a link to the project.
Name of the institution(s) managing the ex situ population		Hamilton Zoo
The year that the program started		2006
Is at least some portion of the captive population maintained in range country?		Yes
Are sufficient resources available to manage the ex situ population?		Yes
If additional financial resources are required then then there should be an entry for the needs in the Conservation Projects list. This is a link to the project.
Are adequate numbers of skilled staff available with the appropriate ex situ amphibian experience?		Yes
If additional staff training/expertise is required then then there should be an entry for the needs in the Conservation Projects list. This is a link to the project.
Is sufficient space available for the required population size?		Yes
If additional facilities are required then then there should be an entry for the needs in the Conservation Projects list. This is a link to the project.
Has a Taxon Management Coordinator for the ex situ population been appointed?		Yes
Name of the Taxon Management Coordinator		Kara Goddard
Taxon Management Coordinator’s institution		Hamilton Zoo
Taxon Management Coordinator’s email address		kara.goddard@hcc.govt.nz
Has a Taxon Management Group or Recovery Team been established?		Yes
Names and institutions of Taxon Management Group members		New Zealand Native Frog Recovery Group
Has a Taxon Management Plan, Recovery Plan or Species Action Statement been written?
Web link to Taxon Management Plan
Have Husbandry Guidelines been written?		Yes
Web link to Husbandry Management Guidelines		Not published
Have any knowledge gaps in the species biology or in their interaction with potential threats been identified that could benefit from research using the ex-situ population?		Yes
List of any knowledge gaps
Have founder needs been calculated using the AArk Amphibian Population Management Guidelines?
Have sufficient potential founders been collected?		Yes
If sufficient founders have not been collected, is there an ongoing search for additional founders?
The number of potential founders that were collected (males, females and unsexed).		45 unsexed, though now known to have female bias with limited males
Is the ex situ population managed by nationals from the range country?		Yes
What tools are used to maximize retention of gene diversity?
Has the population produced viable offspring?		No
Have the first generation captive-bred animals bred successfully?		No
Is the ex situ population housed in permanent isolation from other populations occurring outside its range?		Yes
Is work being supported to study and mitigate threats to the species in the wild, either by the institution or by a regional wildlife agency?		Yes
Have captive-bred or captive-reared animals been released into the wild?		No
If releases were undertaken, have disease screening protocols or veterinary health checks been conducted prior to releases to the wild?
Is follow-up work being carried out to monitor progress of the released animals?
Is the taxon again secure in the wild, even if it might still require some ongoing in situ management? i.e., has the need for a captive assurance population been obviated such that we can call this a successfully terminated captive rescue program?		No
Comments		We received 45 frogs in 2006, so these are the basis of our founding population.