Sin un manejo inmediato en cautiverio como un componente provisional en un esfuerzo integrado de conservación, cientos de especies podrían extinguirse. Porque los recursos disponibles en los zoológicos y acuarios son limitados, el Arca de los Anfibios debe tratar de identificar que especies requieren de rescate en cautiverio y manejo más urgente. Las siguientes especies han sido evaluadas en talleres nacionales o regionales como estando en necesidad de rescate urgente – estas son especies que todavía existen en vida libre, pero las amenazas que enfrentan no pueden o no podrán ser revertidas a tiempo para prevenir la extinción de la especie. Las amenazas que constituyen peligro inminente de extinción incluye amenazas para las cuales actualmente no tenemos remedio (por ejemplo el hongo quitrido, incluyendo cualquier especie conocida o sospechada de ser susceptible, cambio climático, incluyendo cualquier especie documentada de drásticamente contraer su rango, por ejemplo la salamandra de montaña en Centroamérica (per Wake et al.) y la rana de montaña en Madagascar (per Raxworthy et al.)) o amenazas para las cuales si tenemos remedio pero no los recursos o la voluntad para intervenir (por ejemplo la destrucción inminente de más del 50% del hábitat por construcciones de presas, minería/polución etc., o especies colectadas para el borde de la extinción)
La version actual del proceso de Evaluación de las Necesidades de Conservación AArk ha sido usada para generar más de 2.653 evaluaciones para más de 2,307 especies (31% de las 7,530 especies que se conocen actualmente) en 27 países o regions. Están en camino muchas otras evaluaciones a nivel país. Los resultados de los previos talleres de evaluación están disponibles en nuestro nuevo programa de evaluación en línea. Evaluaciones adicionales están planificadas para otros países y regiones en los meses venideros. Los beneficios de este proceso de evaluación están claros – nosotros reunimos a los expertos de anfibios en el campo en cada región, para colectivamente determinar el mejor curso de acciones de conservación para ayudar prevenir la extinción de especies de anfibios amenazados en la naturaleza. Estas acciones incluyen restauración y preservación de hábitat, mitigación de amenazas, reproducción en cautiverio para liberación y concientización e involucramiento de la comunidad.
AArk recomienda que los programas de rescate sean establecidos en los países del rango de distribución de la especie siempre que esto sea possible. A los zoológicos, acuarios y otras organizaciones de reproducción en cautiverio que estén considerando la implementación de nuevos programas de conservación de anfibios se les recomienda fuertemente considerar las siguientes especies, , ya que todas han sido recomendadas para programas de rescate urgente por la Evaluación de las Necesidades de Conservación. Información respecto a la disponibilidad de animales fundadores y la compleción de un estudio filogenético relevante se incluye donde se conoce. Esta información puede indicar cuales especies actualmente son apropiadas para programas de rescate en cautiverio, y aquellas que pueden beneficiarse de investigación adicional en vida libre antes que un programa en cautiverio se establezca. Las especies que se espera tengan fundadores de vida libre disponibles y los cuales han pasado por una revisión filogenética deberían tal vez ser considerados antes de los que la información es incompleta.
Haz click en la pestaña de país para ver lase species recomendadas para rescate urgente en cada país.
- Argentina
- Bolivia
- Brazil
- Chile
- Dominica
- Dominican Republic
- Ecuador
- Guatemala
- Haiti
- India
- Indonesia
- Jamaica
- Madagascar
- Philippines
- Puerto Rico
- Singapore
- Sri Lanka
- United States
-
Telmatobius ceiorum
Comments: Parte de la distribucion se encuentra en area protegida, pero no presenta proteccion efectiva. Amenaza: trucha. Hay una siembra continua de truchas debido a que no son viables. Deforestacion. Hace 8 años que se las esta buscando, y no se encontraron especimenes.
Assessed: 26 Oct 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3584&SpeciesID=5438&CountryID=99
Telmatobius laticeps
Comments: No se encuentra dentro de un area protegida. Amenazas: trucha, dinamica de arroyos, causas climaticas no necesariamente relacionadas con actividades humanas . Estan en una zona restringida. En zonas donde no esta la trucha, tambien hubo declinacion de la especie (no se sabe bien la causa). Se las busca hace un buen tiempo (8-10 años), sin ser encontradas.
Assessed: 26 Oct 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3602&SpeciesID=5459&CountryID=99
Telmatobius pisanoi (Program exists at La Plata University)
Comments: No se encuentra en areas protegidas. Se encontro Bd relacionado con disminucion. Se encuentran en zonas secas. Se han encontrado muy pocos ejemplares.
Assessed: 26 Oct 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3616&SpeciesID=5471&CountryID=99
Telmatobius schreiteri
Comments: No se encuentran en areas naturales protegidas. Amenazas: trucha. Fueron buscados por los ultimos 5 años sin encontrarse ejemplares.
Assessed: 26 Oct 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3619&SpeciesID=5476&CountryID=99
Telmatobius stephani
Comments: No se encuentra en ambientes naturales protegidos. No fue muy buscado. Amenaza: trucha.
Assessed: 26 Oct 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3623&SpeciesID=5480&CountryID=99
Rhinella achalensis
Comments: Se encuentran dentro de areas protegidas. Esta declinando tanto en areas protegidas como no protegidas. Estudios sobre encuentro entre macho y hembra durante epoca reproductiva necesarios (al no cantar no se sabe como sucede). Amenazas: ganaderia, fuego, Bd. La especie esta declinando (en rango y numero) en areas donde no se encuentran estas amenazas (posibilidad de que existan otras amenazas desconocidas). No se puede establecer una relacion directa de las amenazas con la declinacion de la especie. Se buscan desde hace 4 años y se ha encontrado una sola poblacion (8 ejemplares). Educacion: junto con las especies de Achala, son buen ejemplo de especiacion y endemismo.
Assessed: 26 Oct 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3435&SpeciesID=4687&CountryID=99
-
Telmatobius culeus Titicaca Water Frog (Program exists at Museo de Historia Natural Alcide d’Orbigny)
Comments: No tiene una distincion biologica pero sin embargo es la rana completamente acuatica mas grande del mundo y habita lugares muy altos en los Andes,fisiologicamente es una de las pocas especies adaptadas a la altura. Es importante culturalmente ya que en las comunidades locales los consideran como seres espirituales tambien de importancia economica ya que es comercializada en restaurantes aunque ultimamente este factor en disminucion pero una reciente y muy creciente es el uso de la especie para los jugos de ranas en especial en el lado peruano que comienza a ingresar en el territorio boliviano, ultimamente se registro como especie usada para mascota. Si hubo trabajos pero aun falta revisar la taxonomia de esta especie.
Assessed: 5 Jun 2014 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3589&SpeciesID=5443&CountryID=100
Telmatobius marmoratus Marbled Water Frog
Comments: Utilizado para ceremonias de fertilidad, a la vez como carnada para peces, tambien en jugo de rana (Bolivia).
Assessed: 5 Jun 2014 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3605&SpeciesID=5462&CountryID=100
Telmatobius gigas
Comments: Puede ser analogo para otras especies de altura. Distincion bioogica y es un potencial para educacion por el tamano de las larvas.
Assessed: 5 Jun 2014 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3595&SpeciesID=5449&CountryID=100
Hyloscirtus chlorosteus Parjacti Treefrog
Assessed: 5 Jun 2014 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3779&SpeciesID=6059&CountryID=100
Gastrotheca lauzuricae La Siberia Marsupial Frog
Comments: Presente en un area protegida, pero no eficazmente. Es la unica poblacion que se conoce. Se esta discutiendo la taxonomia de esta especie.
Assessed: 5 Jun 2014 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3690&SpeciesID=5741&CountryID=100
Nymphargus pluvialis Pistipata Cochran Frog
Comments: Se coloca si hay mandato, porque se sugiere que esta especie se cambie de categoria a (Criticamente amenazada). Sobre el estatus taxonomico no existen estudios recientes.
Assessed: 5 Jun 2014 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3535&SpeciesID=4905&CountryID=100
Oreobates zongoensis
Assessed: 5 Jun 2014 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2708&SpeciesID=420&CountryID=100
Rhinella amboroensis
Comments: El unico registro de la especie se encuentra en un area protegida que esta en mal estado. medidas de mitigacion no sor reversibles debido a que su habitat se encuentra ya muy degradado.
Assessed: 5 Jun 2014 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3437&SpeciesID=4693&CountryID=100
Telmatobius bolivianus
Assessed: 5 Jun 2014 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3581&SpeciesID=5433&CountryID=100
Telmatobius edaphonastes
Comments: R) No es un analogo.
Assessed: 5 Jun 2014 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3592&SpeciesID=5446&CountryID=100
Telmatobius espadai
Comments: H) habitat destruido. R) En caso de encontarr las poblaciones servirian como analogos para otras especies.
Assessed: 5 Jun 2014 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3593&SpeciesID=5447&CountryID=100
Telmatobius sibiricus
Comments: Existe habitat en buenas condiciones, sin embargo en muchos de estos podria estar presente el hongo quitridio. Este criterio se aplicara para todas las especies del genero Telmatobius.
Assessed: 5 Jun 2014 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3621&SpeciesID=5478&CountryID=100
Telmatobius simonsi Sucre Water Frog (Program exists at Museo de Historia Natural Alcide d’Orbigny)
Assessed: 5 Jun 2014 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3622&SpeciesID=5479&CountryID=100
Telmatobius timens (Program exists at Huaysca)
Assessed: 5 Jun 2014 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3624&SpeciesID=5482&CountryID=100
Telmatobius verrucosus
Assessed: 5 Jun 2014 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3627&SpeciesID=5485&CountryID=100
Telmatobius yuracare (Program exists at Museo de Historia Natural Alcide d’Orbigny)
Comments: Solo se cuenta con un individuo macho en cautiverio
Assessed: 5 Jun 2014 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3629&SpeciesID=5487&CountryID=100
Atelopus tricolor Three-colored Stubfoot Toad, Three-coloured Harlequin Toad
Comments: Se piensa que la amenaza principal, quitridio no podra ser eliminada del area por lo cual es dificil su recuperacion. Es una especies interesante para educacion debido a que es una especie vistosa y de habitos diurnos
Assessed: 5 Jun 2014 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3182&SpeciesID=2605&CountryID=100
Gastrotheca splendens Schmidt’s Marsupial Frog
Assessed: 5 Jun 2014 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3701&SpeciesID=5764&CountryID=100
Psychrophrynella guillei
Comments: Hay muchos cultivos alrededor del habitat de esta especie.
Assessed: 5 Jun 2014 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3218&SpeciesID=3270&CountryID=100
Psychrophrynella harveyi
Assessed: 5 Jun 2014 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3219&SpeciesID=3271&CountryID=100
Rhinella quechua
Comments: Se requiere mayores estudios taxonomicos.
Assessed: 5 Jun 2014 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3460&SpeciesID=4745&CountryID=100
Telmatobius hintoni
Comments: No existe una sobre colecta, sin embargo en Cochabamba se la colecta localmente para practicas universitarias.
Assessed: 5 Jun 2014 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3598&SpeciesID=5452&CountryID=100
Telmatobius sanborni
Assessed: 5 Jun 2014 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3618&SpeciesID=5475&CountryID=100
Nymphargus bejaranoi Bolivian Cochran Frog
Assessed: 5 Jun 2014 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3526&SpeciesID=4883&CountryID=100
Rhinella rumbolli
Comments: Presente en las localidades de Tariquia, Alarache. Puede ser afectada por la presencia de quitridio.
Assessed: 5 Jun 2014 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3465&SpeciesID=4751&CountryID=100
Rhinella stanlaii
Comments: La deforestacion y la posible presencia de Quitridio amenazan a la especie.
Assessed: 5 Jun 2014 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3470&SpeciesID=4757&CountryID=100
Rhinella tacana
Assessed: 5 Jun 2014 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3471&SpeciesID=4759&CountryID=100
Rhinella veraguensis
Assessed: 5 Jun 2014 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3472&SpeciesID=4763&CountryID=100
Rulyrana spiculata
Comments: Existen estudios taxonomicos porque recientemente se cambio el genero
Assessed: 5 Jun 2014 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3541&SpeciesID=4922&CountryID=100
-
Cycloramphus faustoi
Comments: Known to be in a protected park, but the Brazilian navy uses the park for training, and this destroys habitat. This species protects the eggs by sitting on them, and keeping them wet. Analog would be C. eleutherodactylus.
Assessed: 12 Aug 2009 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=506&SpeciesID=3322&CountryID=101
Holoaden bradei Itatiaia Highland Frog
Comments: H. luederwaldti can be used as an analog for this species. Has not been seen since 1976.
Assessed: 12 Aug 2009 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=967&SpeciesID=372&CountryID=101
Scinax alcatraz (Program exists at Fundação Parque Zoológico de São Paulo)
Comments: Known to be in a protected park, but the Brazilian navy uses the park for training, and this destroys habitat. Analog would be S. perpusillus. Can contact Cinthia Brasileiro for additional information
Assessed: 12 Aug 2009 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2460&SpeciesID=1707&CountryID=101
Scinax faivovichi
Comments: Analog for this species is S. perpusillus. The entire population occurs outside protected areas (Marcio Martins, pers comm).
Assessed: 12 Aug 2009 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2466&SpeciesID=1745&CountryID=101
Physalaemus soaresi
Comments: P. olfersii is an analog for this species. This species is found in a city park that is not protected.
Assessed: 12 Aug 2009 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=1994&SpeciesID=4081&CountryID=101
Thoropa lutzi
Comments: Has very interesting reproductive biology (tadpoles are semi-terrestrial). Analog for this species is T. miliaris and T. taophora.
Assessed: 12 Aug 2009 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2580&SpeciesID=3341&CountryID=101
Bokermannohyla vulcaniae
Comments: The major threat is rapid habitat destruction due to mining. Can use B. circumdata as an analog for this species.
Assessed: 12 Aug 2009 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=232&SpeciesID=5866&CountryID=101
Dendrophryniscus stawiarskyi
Assessed: 12 Aug 2009 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=524&SpeciesID=2643&CountryID=101
Dendropsophus limai
Comments: Known only from one locality, which is not protected (Felipe Toledo, pers comm). This species is probably a synonym of D. minutus.
Assessed: 12 Aug 2009 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=530&SpeciesID=5921&CountryID=101
Melanophryniscus alipioi
Comments: Not in the GAA list. Added by Magno Segalla. Has not been evaluated, but is considered to be as endangered as Brachycephalus pernix.
Assessed: 12 Aug 2009 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=1645&SpeciesID=4541&CountryID=101
Melanophryniscus macrogranulosus
Comments: Has not been seen since 1960s.
Assessed: 12 Aug 2009 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=1648&SpeciesID=4551&CountryID=101
Proceratophrys palustris
Comments: Known only from the type locality.
Assessed: 12 Aug 2009 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2180&SpeciesID=2674&CountryID=101
Thoropa petropolitana
Comments: Has very interesting reproductive biology (tadpoles are semi-terrestrial). Analog for this species is T. miliaris and T. taophora.
Assessed: 12 Aug 2009 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2583&SpeciesID=3344&CountryID=101
Phrynomedusa appendiculata
Comments: Analog for this species is P. marginata or P. vanzolinii.
Assessed: 12 Aug 2009 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=1976&SpeciesID=1571&CountryID=101
-
Rhinoderma rufum
Comments: Está clasificada como «insuficientemente conocida» y «rara» según la ley chilena. Potencial educativo por estrategia reproductiva y desarrollo
Assessed: 4 Dec 2009 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3244&SpeciesID=3339&CountryID=102
Insuetophrynus acarpicus
Comments: Está clasificada «en peligro» y «rara» según la ley chilena. Se encontró una población cerca del área descrita en Queule y Colegual Alto(Marco Mendez).
Assessed: 4 Dec 2009 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3241&SpeciesID=3336&CountryID=102
Alsodes montanus Mountain Spiny-chest Frog
Comments: En peligro y «rara» según la ley chilena. Los últimos dos años se ha encontrado al borde de una carretera en Puente Blanco (32 kms de Farellones) (Correa et al, 2008,Marco Mendez) en Camino a termas del Flaco (Sergio Araya, 2008 Boletín Museo Historia Natural)
Assessed: 4 Dec 2009 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3046&SpeciesID=2052&CountryID=102
Alsodes tumultuosus La Parva Spiny-chest Frog
Comments: En peligro y «rara» según la ley chilena
Assessed: 4 Dec 2009 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3050&SpeciesID=2057&CountryID=102
Alsodes vanzolinii Vanzolini’s Spiny-chest Frog (Program exists at Universidad de Concepción)
Assessed: 4 Dec 2009 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3052&SpeciesID=2059&CountryID=102
Telmatobius pefauri Arico Water Frog
Comments: Está clasificada como «en peligro» y «rara» por la ley chilena (A los todos los telmatobius se les dice jampato»)
Assessed: 4 Dec 2009 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3611&SpeciesID=5467&CountryID=102
Telmatobius zapahuirensis Zapahuira Water Frog
Comments: Está en el mismo habitat que T Pefauri. Es endémica. Telmatobius en general son especies con muy pocos individuos que han subsistido así por mucho tiempo y son mjy raras para permitir colectar fundadores para cría en cautiverio.
Assessed: 4 Dec 2009 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3630&SpeciesID=5488&CountryID=102
Eupsophus contulmoensis Contulmo Ground Frog
Comments: Endémico.
Assessed: 4 Dec 2009 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3057&SpeciesID=2063&CountryID=102
Eupsophus migueli Miguel’s Ground Frog
Comments: En peligro y «rara» por la ley chilena.
Assessed: 4 Dec 2009 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3061&SpeciesID=2066&CountryID=102
-
Leptodactylus fallax Mountain Chicken
Comments: There has been 99% population decline on Montserrat in the last ten years (R. Gibson, pers. comm. March 2011). Re-introduction has taken place on Montserrat. Also released in Puerto Rico in the 1960s for food, but this failed. Chytrid has been the largest threat, but collection for food has alos decreased numbers. This species has a unique reproductive biology. Is on the Dominican coat of arms. Is being re-introduced into known chytrid habitats as a study species into mitigating chytrid (R. Gibson, pers. comm. March 2011).
Assessed: 26 Mar 2011 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=1364&SpeciesID=3973&CountryID=67
-
Eleutherodactylus schmidti Schmidt’s Robber Frog, Hispaniolan Streamside Frog
Comments: Possibly extinct, last seen in 1986 (M. Landestoy, pers. comm. March 2011). Education potential is high to talk about extinctions and protection of the environment (M. Landestoy, pers. comm. March 2011).
Assessed: 26 Mar 2011 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=772&SpeciesID=3852&CountryID=68
Peltophryne fluviatica Hispaniolan Crestless Toad
Comments: Thought to be locally extinct (M. Landestoy, pers. comm. March 2011).
Assessed: 26 Mar 2011 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=1926&SpeciesID=4638&CountryID=68
Peltophryne fracta Eastern Crested Toad
Comments: Possibly extinct – has not been seen since 1969. Habitat is degraded due to cattle (M. Landestoy, pers. comm. March 2011).
Assessed: 26 Mar 2011 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=1927&SpeciesID=4639&CountryID=68
Eleutherodactylus rucillensis Rucilla Streamside Frog
Comments: Probably extinct (M. Rodriguez, pers. comm. March 2011).
Assessed: 26 Mar 2011 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=767&SpeciesID=3847&CountryID=68
-
Atelopus ignescens Jambato Toad, Quito Stubfoot Toad
Comments: Existen áreas protegidas en su rango de distribución pero no alcanzan el 50% del rango. La especie se cree que está extinta en la naturaleza, pues no ha sido vista desde 1988. Tiene una significación cultural importante pues era utilizada para medicina tradicional en los Andes y además la ciudad de Ambato debe su nombre a esta rana. La supervivencia de esta especie va a depender de investigación realizada en laboratorio. Cuando fue común fue mantenido en laboratorio para investigación embriológica.
Assessed: 11 Jun 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3141&SpeciesID=2555&CountryID=104
Atelopus nanay (Programs exist at Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Centro Jambatu de Investigación y Conservación de Anfibios and Zoo Amaru)
Comments: Mantenidos en el Centro de Conservación de Anfibios Amaru (2009-2012). Esta especie ha sido utilizada como parte de medicina tradicional. Puede ser utilizada como una especie análoga para Atelopus ignescens.
Assessed: 11 Jun 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3154&SpeciesID=2570&CountryID=104
Gastrotheca guentheri
Comments: Es la unica especie que tiene dientes en la mandíbula inferior.
Assessed: 11 Jun 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3689&SpeciesID=5738&CountryID=104
Telmatobius niger Black Water Frog
Comments: Mantenida en el Museo QCAZ a inicios de la década de los 90. Esta especie ha sido utilizada como parte de medicina tradicional.
Assessed: 11 Jun 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3609&SpeciesID=5465&CountryID=104
Rhaebo blombergi Blomberg’s Toad, Colombian Giant Toad
Comments: Esta especie es el bufonido más grande conocido.
Assessed: 11 Jun 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3429&SpeciesID=4677&CountryID=104
Andinobates abditus Collins’ Poison Frog
Assessed: 11 Jun 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3256&SpeciesID=3380&CountryID=104
Atelopus angelito
Assessed: 11 Jun 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3118&SpeciesID=2520&CountryID=104
Atelopus balios Rio Pescado Stubfoot Toad (Program exists at Centro Jambatu de Investigación y Conservación de Anfibios)
Comments: Mantenidos en cautiverio por el Centro Jambatu.
Assessed: 11 Jun 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3120&SpeciesID=2524&CountryID=104
Atelopus bomolochos Azuay Stubfoot Toad
Comments: Mantenidos en el Museo de Zoología (QCAZ) (2002).
Assessed: 11 Jun 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3121&SpeciesID=2525&CountryID=104
Atelopus exiguus (Program exists at Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador)
Comments: Mantenidos en el Zoologico Amaru, Cuenca (2005-2009) y en la Balsa de los Sapos (2009-2011).
Assessed: 11 Jun 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3134&SpeciesID=2544&CountryID=104
Atelopus guanujo
Assessed: 11 Jun 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3139&SpeciesID=2552&CountryID=104
Atelopus longirostris Longnose Stubfoot Toad, Scrawny Stubfoot-toad (Program exists at Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador)
Comments: Esta especie también es considerada extinta.
Assessed: 11 Jun 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3144&SpeciesID=2559&CountryID=104
Atelopus orcesi
Comments: Las causas de su desaparición aun son desconocidas.
Assessed: 11 Jun 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3158&SpeciesID=2574&CountryID=104
Atelopus pachydermus Schmidt’s Stubfoot Toad(Program exists at Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador)
Comments: Las causas de su desaparición aun son desconocidas.
Assessed: 11 Jun 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3160&SpeciesID=2577&CountryID=104
Atelopus pastuso
Comments: Las causas de su desaparición aun son desconocidas.
Assessed: 11 Jun 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3162&SpeciesID=2579&CountryID=104
Atelopus petersi
Comments: Las causas de su desaparición aun son desconocidas.
Assessed: 11 Jun 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3165&SpeciesID=2583&CountryID=104
Atelopus podocarpus
Assessed: 11 Jun 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3170&SpeciesID=2588&CountryID=104
Centrolene buckleyi (Programs exist at Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador and Centro Jambatu de Investigación y Conservación de Anfibios)
Comments: Esta especie ha sido reproducida y mantenida en la Balsa de los Sapos (PUCE). Esta especie ya ha sido manejada y podría ser utilizada para educar a las personas de las ciudades donde ocurría.
Assessed: 11 Jun 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3481&SpeciesID=4797&CountryID=104
Centrolene geckoideum
Comments: Esta especie es el centrolenido más grande conocido.
Assessed: 11 Jun 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3484&SpeciesID=4802&CountryID=104
Centrolene gemmatum
Assessed: 11 Jun 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3485&SpeciesID=4803&CountryID=104
Centrolene pipilatum
Assessed: 11 Jun 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3493&SpeciesID=4820&CountryID=104
Cochranella balionota
Comments: Se cambió el género a la taxonomía más reconocida Cochranella balionota.
Assessed: 11 Jun 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3499&SpeciesID=4830&CountryID=104
Hyloxalus anthracinus South American Rocket Frog (Programs exist at Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador and Zoo Amaru)
Comments: Mantenidos en la Balsa de los Sapos (2010).
Assessed: 11 Jun 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3264&SpeciesID=3419&CountryID=104
Hyloxalus jacobuspetersi (Programs exist at Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador and Centro Jambatu de Investigación y Conservación de Anfibios)
Comments: Was previously Colostethus jacobpetersi. Mantenida en la Balsa de los Sapos (PUCE 2007-2012). Tiene el potencial de educar a las personas de las ciudades donde ocurría.
Assessed: 11 Jun 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3274&SpeciesID=3445&CountryID=104
Nymphargus anomalus Napo Cochran Frog
Assessed: 11 Jun 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3525&SpeciesID=4881&CountryID=104
Osornophryne talipes Cannatella’s Plump Toad
Assessed: 11 Jun 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3427&SpeciesID=4617&CountryID=104
Telmatobius cirrhacelis Loja Water Frog
Assessed: 11 Jun 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3586&SpeciesID=5440&CountryID=104
Telmatobius vellardi Vellard’s Water Frog
Assessed: 11 Jun 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3626&SpeciesID=5484&CountryID=104
Atelopus lynchi
Comments: Las causas de su desaparición aun son desconocidas.
Assessed: 11 Jun 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3146&SpeciesID=2561&CountryID=104
Atelopus mindoensis Mindo Stubfoot Toad
Comments: Las causas de su desaparición aun son desconocidas.
Assessed: 11 Jun 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3148&SpeciesID=2563&CountryID=104
Atelopus planispina Flat-spined Atelopus
Comments: Aun se discute el estatus de esta especie con respecto a Atelopus palmatus.
Assessed: 11 Jun 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3169&SpeciesID=2587&CountryID=104
Hyloscirtus tapichalaca
Comments: Se considera el estado de conservación de esta especie a En peligro.
Assessed: 11 Jun 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3791&SpeciesID=6082&CountryID=104
Osornophryne puruanta
Comments: Esta especie fue mantenida en el Museo QCAZ alrededor del año 2000.
Assessed: 11 Jun 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3424&SpeciesID=4614&CountryID=104
Pristimantis modipeplus
Comments: Esta especie se determina que está amenazada por la erupción del volcán Tungurahua. Sería la especie más urgente de rescatar.
Assessed: 11 Jun 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2801&SpeciesID=688&CountryID=104
Pristimantis pastazensis
Comments: Esta especie se determina que está amenazada por la erupción del volcán Tungurahua. Sería la especie más urgente de rescatar.
Assessed: 11 Jun 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2819&SpeciesID=725&CountryID=104
Pristimantis truebae
Assessed: 11 Jun 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2877&SpeciesID=848&CountryID=104
Pristimantis tungurahua
Comments: Se evalua el estado de conservación y se establece que es En Peligro.
Assessed: 11 Jun 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2878&SpeciesID=850&CountryID=104
Ctenophryne aequatorialis (Programs at Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Zoo Amaru and Centro Jambatu de Investigación y Conservación de Anfibios)
Comments: Mantenidos en laboratorio en varios centros Balsa de los Sapos, Jambatu, Amaru.
Assessed: 11 Jun 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3831&SpeciesID=6497&CountryID=104
Atelopus nepiozomus Gualecenita Stubfoot Toad
Comments: Se decide incluir esta especie DD porque existen registros recientes en el sur del país. Las causas de su desaparición son desconocidas.
Assessed: 11 Jun 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3155&SpeciesID=2571&CountryID=104
Atelopus palmatus (Programs exist at Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador and Centro Jambatu de Investigación y Conservación de Anfibios)
Comments: Se mantienen algunos individuos en la Balsa de los Sapos (2010-2012).
Assessed: 11 Jun 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3161&SpeciesID=2578&CountryID=104
Atelopus spumarius Pebas Stubfoot Toad (Program exists at Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Centro Jambatu de Investigación y Conservación de Anfibios)
Comments: Se decide cambiar el estado de conservación a Vulnerable.
Assessed: 11 Jun 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3178&SpeciesID=2601&CountryID=104
Centrolene condor
Assessed: 11 Jun 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3482&SpeciesID=4798&CountryID=104
Hyloxalus maquipucuna
Assessed: 11 Jun 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3277&SpeciesID=3450&CountryID=104
Hyloxalus mystax
Assessed: 11 Jun 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3279&SpeciesID=3453&CountryID=104
Rhaebo caeruleostictus Blue-spotted Toad
Assessed: 11 Jun 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3430&SpeciesID=4678&CountryID=104
Strabomantis necerus
Assessed: 11 Jun 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3234&SpeciesID=3296&CountryID=104
Atelopus arthuri Arthur’s Stubfoot Toad
Assessed: 11 Jun 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3119&SpeciesID=2523&CountryID=104
Atelopus onorei
Comments: Las causas de su desaparición aun son desconocidas.
Assessed: 11 Jun 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3157&SpeciesID=2573&CountryID=104
Hyloxalus delatorreae (Programs exist at Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador and Zoo Amaru)
Comments: Mantenidos en la Balsa de los Sapos (2008-2009).
Assessed: 11 Jun 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3268&SpeciesID=3431&CountryID=104
Rhinella amabilis
Assessed: 11 Jun 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3436&SpeciesID=4692&CountryID=104
Pristimantis duellmani
Assessed: 11 Jun 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2761&SpeciesID=568&CountryID=104
Pristimantis quinquagesimus
Assessed: 11 Jun 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2839&SpeciesID=765&CountryID=104
Strabomantis anomalus
Assessed: 11 Jun 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3230&SpeciesID=3285&CountryID=104
Strabomantis cerastes
Assessed: 11 Jun 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3233&SpeciesID=3290&CountryID=104
Pristimantis simonbolivari
Assessed: 11 Jun 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2859&SpeciesID=809&CountryID=104
-
Dendrotriton bromeliacius Volcan Tajumulco Bromeliad Salamander
Comments:
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2905&SpeciesID=927&CountryID=89
Dendrotriton cuchumatanus Forest Bromeliad Salamander
Comments: Esta especie fue colectada alrededor de 1995 en una cueva en todos santos, luego se colectaron renacuajos en el 2003, y en el 2009 no se encontraron ni renacuajos ni adultos. Se consiera esta especie extinta (Campbell, Manuel Acevedo, Jacobo Conde).
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2906&SpeciesID=929&CountryID=89
Dendrotriton rabbi Guatemalan Bromeliad Salamander
Comments: Destrucción de su hábitat especialmente bromelias la pone en riesgo (Ted Papenfuss y Carlos Vásquez).
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2907&SpeciesID=932&CountryID=89
Craugastor trachydermus
Comments:
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2683&SpeciesID=356&CountryID=89
Exerodonta perkinsi
Comments:
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3773&SpeciesID=6000&CountryID=89
Hyla walkeri
Comments: En algunos sitios se ha vuelto poco común.
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3775&SpeciesID=6042&CountryID=89
Plectrohyla acanthodes
Comments: La mayoría de la condición de peligro de las Plectrohyla no puede o no podrá ser revertida a tiempo. La mayoría de la condición de peligro de las Plectrohyla no puede o no podrá ser revertida a tiempo.
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2976&SpeciesID=1620&CountryID=89
Plectrohyla avia
Comments:
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2977&SpeciesID=1623&CountryID=89
Plectrohyla glandulosa Forest Spikethumb Frog
Comments:
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2978&SpeciesID=1638&CountryID=89
Plectrohyla hartwegi Hartweg’s Spikethumb Frog
Comments:
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2980&SpeciesID=1640&CountryID=89
Plectrohyla ixil
Comments:
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2981&SpeciesID=1642&CountryID=89
Plectrohyla pokomchi
Comments:
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2983&SpeciesID=1650&CountryID=89
Plectrohyla teuchestes
Comments:
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2987&SpeciesID=1660&CountryID=89
Ptychohyla dendrophasma
Comments: Para la mayoría de Ptychohyla se desconoce la mitigación de amenazas.
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2991&SpeciesID=1690&CountryID=89
Ptychohyla sanctaecrucis
Comments: Se encontró una nueva localidad a 3km al este de la localidad tipo, actualmente existe exploración minera en el lugar.
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2998&SpeciesID=1699&CountryID=89
Bolitoglossa flavimembris Yellow-legged Salamander
Comments:
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3648&SpeciesID=5635&CountryID=89
Bolitoglossa flaviventris Yellow-bellied Salamander
Comments:
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3649&SpeciesID=5636&CountryID=89
Craugastor inachus
Comments:
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2651&SpeciesID=294&CountryID=89
Craugastor palenque
Comments:
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2663&SpeciesID=321&CountryID=89
Craugastor rivulus
Comments:
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2673&SpeciesID=338&CountryID=89
Craugastor sabrinus Long-legged Streamfrog
Comments: Pobremente abundante.
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2677&SpeciesID=343&CountryID=89
Craugastor sandersoni Sanderson’s Rainfrog, Sanderson’s Streamfrog
Comments: Pobremente abundante.
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2678&SpeciesID=345&CountryID=89
Incilius tutelarius
Comments: Existe interés de comprar tierras en las montañas de Cuilco. Su reproducción es similar a I. campbelli.
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3407&SpeciesID=4524&CountryID=89
Nyctanolis pernix Nimble Long-limbed Salamander
Comments: Especie muy sensible, ocurre solamente en bosque primario, muy bien conservado (Carlos Vásquez y Ted Papenfuss). Para la recuperación de la población el bosque debe estar en muy buenas condiciones.
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2917&SpeciesID=1008&CountryID=89
Craugastor adamastus
Comments:
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3563&SpeciesID=5052&CountryID=89
Craugastor amniscola
Comments:
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3565&SpeciesID=5054&CountryID=89
Craugastor matudai
Comments:
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2655&SpeciesID=302&CountryID=89
Craugastor rupinius
Comments: Pobremente abundante.
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2676&SpeciesID=342&CountryID=89
Bromeliohyla bromeliacia Bromeliad Treefrog
Comments: En la década de 1970 era demasiado común, actualente es muy difícil de encontrar (Jonathan Campbell).
Assessed: 10 Aug 2015 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3722&SpeciesID=5867&CountryID=89
Hyla bocourti Bocourt’s Treefrog
Comments:
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3774&SpeciesID=6013&CountryID=89
Incilius bocourti
Comments: Aún no existen áreas protegidas en la cual se encuentre el 50% de las poblaciones, pero existen procesos para declarar áreas protegidas donde se encuentra esta especie (Carlos Vásquez, Manuel Acevedo).
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3388&SpeciesID=4492&CountryID=89
Plectrohyla tecunumani
Comments:
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2986&SpeciesID=1659&CountryID=89
Pseudoeurycea brunnata Brown False Brook Salamander
Comments: No hay informacion suficiente sobre el grupo No requiere esfuerzo de conservación, pero puede usarsr como experiencia para reproducción
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2936&SpeciesID=1092&CountryID=89
Pseudoeurycea exspectata Jalpa False Brook Salamander
Comments: No hay informacion suficiente sobre el grupo No requiere esfuerzo de conservación, pero puede usarsr como experiencia para reproducción
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2937&SpeciesID=1096&CountryID=89
-
Dendrotriton bromeliacius Volcan Tajumulco Bromeliad Salamander
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2905&SpeciesID=927&CountryID=89
Dendrotriton cuchumatanus Forest Bromeliad Salamander
Comments: Esta especie fue colectada alrededor de 1995 en una cueva en todos santos, luego se colectaron renacuajos en el 2003, y en el 2009 no se encontraron ni renacuajos ni adultos. Se consiera esta especie extinta (Campbell, Manuel Acevedo, Jacobo Conde).
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2906&SpeciesID=929&CountryID=89
Dendrotriton rabbi Guatemalan Bromeliad Salamander
Comments: Destrucción de su hábitat especialmente bromelias la pone en riesgo (Ted Papenfuss y Carlos Vásquez).
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2907&SpeciesID=932&CountryID=89
Craugastor trachydermus
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2683&SpeciesID=356&CountryID=89
Exerodonta perkinsi
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3773&SpeciesID=6000&CountryID=89
Hyla walkeri
Comments: En algunos sitios se ha vuelto poco común.
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3775&SpeciesID=6042&CountryID=89
Plectrohyla acanthodes
Comments: La mayoría de la condición de peligro de las Plectrohyla no puede o no podrá ser revertida a tiempo. La mayoría de la condición de peligro de las Plectrohyla no puede o no podrá ser revertida a tiempo.
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2976&SpeciesID=1620&CountryID=89
Plectrohyla avia
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2977&SpeciesID=1623&CountryID=89
Plectrohyla glandulosa Forest Spikethumb Frog
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2978&SpeciesID=1638&CountryID=89
Plectrohyla hartwegi Hartweg’s Spikethumb Frog
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2980&SpeciesID=1640&CountryID=89
Plectrohyla ixil
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2981&SpeciesID=1642&CountryID=89
Plectrohyla pokomchi
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2983&SpeciesID=1650&CountryID=89
Plectrohyla teuchestes
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2987&SpeciesID=1660&CountryID=89
Ptychohyla dendrophasma
Comments: Para la mayoría de Ptychohyla se desconoce la mitigación de amenazas.
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2991&SpeciesID=1690&CountryID=89
Ptychohyla sanctaecrucis
Comments: Se encontró una nueva localidad a 3km al este de la localidad tipo, actualmente existe exploración minera en el lugar.
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2998&SpeciesID=1699&CountryID=89
Bolitoglossa flavimembris Yellow-legged Salamander
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3648&SpeciesID=5635&CountryID=89
Bolitoglossa flaviventris Yellow-bellied Salamander
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3649&SpeciesID=5636&CountryID=89
Craugastor inachus
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2651&SpeciesID=294&CountryID=89
Craugastor palenque
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2663&SpeciesID=321&CountryID=89
Craugastor rivulus
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2673&SpeciesID=338&CountryID=89
Craugastor sabrinus Long-legged Streamfrog
Comments: Pobremente abundante.
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2677&SpeciesID=343&CountryID=89
Craugastor sandersoni Sanderson’s Rainfrog, Sanderson’s Streamfrog
Comments: Pobremente abundante.
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2678&SpeciesID=345&CountryID=89
Incilius tutelarius
Comments: Existe interés de comprar tierras en las montañas de Cuilco. Su reproducción es similar a I. campbelli.
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3407&SpeciesID=4524&CountryID=89
Nyctanolis pernix Nimble Long-limbed Salamander
Comments: Especie muy sensible, ocurre solamente en bosque primario, muy bien conservado (Carlos Vásquez y Ted Papenfuss). Para la recuperación de la población el bosque debe estar en muy buenas condiciones.
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2917&SpeciesID=1008&CountryID=89
Craugastor adamastus
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3563&SpeciesID=5052&CountryID=89
Craugastor amniscola
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3565&SpeciesID=5054&CountryID=89
Craugastor matudai
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2655&SpeciesID=302&CountryID=89
Craugastor rupinius
Comments: Pobremente abundante.
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2676&SpeciesID=342&CountryID=89
Bromeliohyla bromeliacia Bromeliad Treefrog
Comments: En la década de 1970 era demasiado común, actualente es muy difícil de encontrar (Jonathan Campbell).
Assessed: 10 Aug 2015 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3722&SpeciesID=5867&CountryID=89
Hyla bocourti Bocourt’s Treefrog
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3774&SpeciesID=6013&CountryID=89
Incilius bocourti
Comments: Aún no existen áreas protegidas en la cual se encuentre el 50% de las poblaciones, pero existen procesos para declarar áreas protegidas donde se encuentra esta especie (Carlos Vásquez, Manuel Acevedo).
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3388&SpeciesID=4492&CountryID=89
Plectrohyla tecunumani
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2986&SpeciesID=1659&CountryID=89
Pseudoeurycea brunnata Brown False Brook Salamander
Comments: No hay informacion suficiente sobre el grupo No requiere esfuerzo de conservación, pero puede usarsr como experiencia para reproducción
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2936&SpeciesID=1092&CountryID=89
Pseudoeurycea exspectata Jalpa False Brook Salamander
Comments: No hay informacion suficiente sobre el grupo No requiere esfuerzo de conservación, pero puede usarsr como experiencia para reproducción
Assessed: 6 Feb 2010 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2937&SpeciesID=1096&CountryID=89
-
Bufoides meghalayanus Khasi Hill Rock Toad, Mawblang Toad
Comments: The redlist category needs to revised based on extensive loss of native habitat; ED score is high but not measured
Assessed: 4 Jul 2016 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3974&SpeciesID=2634&CountryID=146
-
Philautus jacobsoni
Assessed: 2 Aug 2015 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3928&SpeciesID=5182&CountryID=133
-
Eleutherodactylus orcutti Arntully Robber Frog, Jamaican Stream Frog
Comments: May be extinct – the only aquatic/stream dwelling (web-footed) Eleutherodactylus spp. – chytrid fungus may be implicated in its rapid apparent demise since mid-1980’s. Urgent research required to determine continued persistence in wild and if so, what threats it faces. Spp. may be a live-bearer.
Assessed: 26 Mar 2011 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=738&SpeciesID=3817&CountryID=72
-
Mantella aurantiaca Golden Mantella, Golden Frog, Red Mantella (Program exists at Association Mitsinjo)
Assessed: 12 Feb 2015 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=1571&SpeciesID=4280&CountryID=7
Mantella milotympanum Black-eared Golden Mantella, Black-eared Mantella
Assessed: 12 Feb 2015 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=1585&SpeciesID=4292&CountryID=7
Stumpffia hara
Assessed: 28 Oct 2015 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3859&SpeciesID=6665&CountryID=7
Boophis baetkei
Assessed: 28 Oct 2015 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3856&SpeciesID=6627&CountryID=7
Stumpffia staffordi
Assessed: 28 Oct 2015 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=3857&SpeciesID=6669&CountryID=7
Boophis williamsi Williams’ Bright-eyed Frog
Comments: In need of research. Little is known on its natural history.
Assessed: 18 Jul 2015 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=325&SpeciesID=4227&CountryID=7
Mantidactylus pauliani
Assessed: 3 Aug 2015 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=1614&SpeciesID=4322&CountryID=7
-
Sanguirana everetti Mindanao Torrent Frog
Comments: Known in the area it was first collected like Mt. Apo. Threat: Habitat loss. It is not seen in great numbers anymore in Mindanao and chytrid may already affected them – hard hit (Diesmos). New genetic data suggest that real S. everetti is a SW Mindanao species…not sure what the Apo population would be since it has not be included in a phylogenetic study (Brown). No inferences can be made on the basis of habitat or forest cover. Need actual surveys of populations (Brown).
Assessed: 3 Jul 2014 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2442&SpeciesID=3254&CountryID=137
Hylarana similis Luzon Striped Stream Frog
Comments: Chytrid infected, effects cannot be reversed in time, high priority, but (Diesmos) they are quiet common on other mountain areas in Luzon, one of the hardest hit frog. H. similis may need to be sunk into grandocula (or vice versa). Brown and Siler (2013) identified a new, currently undescribed species which is known from only a single specimen…extinct? (Brown). H. similis is infected with chytrid and qualitative observations suggest numbers may be declining. No published data yet and Brown and Siler (2013) suggested that this species and H. grandocula may actually represent a single widespread form, which would impact its assessment if true; see: Brown, R. M., and C. D. Siler. 2013. Spotted stream frog diversification at the Australasian faunal zone interface, mainland versus island comparisons, and a test of the Philippine ‘dual-umbilicus’ hypothesis. Journal of Biogeography 41:182–195 (Brown).
Assessed: 3 Jul 2014 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=1106&SpeciesID=3057&CountryID=137
-
Eleutherodactylus jasperi Golden Coqui, Cayey Robber Frog
Comments: Coquis are the national emblem of Puerto Rico and are therefore culturally significant. Species has not been seen since 1981 and is possibly extinct. Only a small amount of the population was in a protected area (R. Joglar, pers. comm. March 2011). One of the few live-bearing frog species.
Assessed: 26 Mar 2011 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=700&SpeciesID=3781&CountryID=75
Eleutherodactylus eneidae Eneida’s Coqui, Elegant Coqui
Comments: Is probably extinct, although known distribution is in protected habitat.. Has not been seen since 1990 (A. R. Estrada, R. Joglar, pers. comm. March 2011). Coquis are the national emblem of Puerto Rico and are therefore culturally significant. Is an important species to raise awareness about species extinctions and the amphibian extinction crisis (R. Joglar, pers. comm. March 2011).
Assessed: 26 Mar 2011 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=663&SpeciesID=3747&CountryID=75
Eleutherodactylus karlschmidti Karl’s Robber Frog, Stream Coqui, Webbed-footed Coqui
Comments: Coquis are the national emblem of Puerto Rico and are therefore culturally significant. Almost certainly extinct. Is an important species to raise awareness about species extinctions and the amphibian extinction crisis (R. Joglar, pers. comm. March 2011).
Assessed: 26 Mar 2011 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=708&SpeciesID=3787&CountryID=75
Eleutherodactylus portoricensis Mountain Coqui, Puerto Rican Robber Frog, Upland Coqui (Program exists at University of Puerto Rico at Humacao)
Comments: Coquis are the national emblem of Puerto Rico and are therefore culturally significant. The remaining population is in protected areas, although the species is rare in this area (R. Joglar, pers. comm. March 2011). Good for education purposes as it has dramatically reducing distribution and only found in cloud forest area (R. Joglar, pers. comm. March 2011).
Assessed: 26 Mar 2011 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=757&SpeciesID=3836&CountryID=75
Eleutherodactylus richmondi Richmond’s Coqui, Richmond’s Robber Frog
Comments: Coquis are the national emblem of Puerto Rico and are therefore culturally significant. No longer exists in protected areas (R. Joglar, pers. comm. March 2011). A captive breeding programs exists in UPR and Central Florida Zoo. Is a very attractive frog and therefore a good species for conservation education. Fertile eggs have been produced but young have not been raised to adults.
Assessed: 26 Mar 2011 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=761&SpeciesID=3840&CountryID=75
Eleutherodactylus gryllus Cricket Coqui, Cricket Robber Frog, Green Coqui
Comments: Has been declining in recent years and has been moving to higher elevations. They are now at the highest elevation. Faces a high risk of extinction (R. Joglar, pers. comm. March 2011). Coquis are the national emblem of Puerto Rico and are therefore culturally significant. Is a good example to use for education about the effects of climate change (R. Joglar, pers. comm. March 2011).
Assessed: 26 Mar 2011 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=684&SpeciesID=3766&CountryID=75
Peltophryne lemur Puerto Rican Crested Toad (Program exists at AZA institutions)
Comments: Much of the population is in protected areas, but the area is being impacted by rising sea levels leading to salt water contamination of ponds. Habitat in the north needs to be restored before additional releases are undertaken (R. Joglar, pers. comm. March 2011). Initial attempts at reintroduction were not very successful, but this has improved over time (R. Joglar, pers. comm. March 2011). Past experience with conservation education is applicable to similar Cuban species (L. Diaz, pers. comm. March 2011).
Assessed: 26 Mar 2011 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=1931&SpeciesID=4643&CountryID=75
-
Megophrys nasuta Malayan Horned Frog, Large Horned Frog (Program exists at Singapore Zoo)
Comments: Ming suggests that there might be a need for in situ research to find out where the females are as they are not often encountered in the wild.
Assessed: 2 Nov 2011 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=1642&SpeciesID=4417&CountryID=138
-
Pseudophilautus femoralis Leaf-nesting Shrub Frog
Comments: Morningside and Corbett’s Gap records are wrong in the GAA. Species from these locations are different/new species. Three new locations from Anslem de Silva (kalds@slt.lk) since the past review (in total 5 locations for the final/real species). Mendis Wickramasinghe – all current confirmed locations within one cluster. May qualifiy for CR. Very sensitive to environmental parameters which makes them very susceptible – maybe irreversible threat. Habitat disappearing with no time for mitigation. Unique breeding strategy of direct development species sticking eggs under leaves with green yolk (Mohomad Bahir publication). Educational value: Attractive species, colourful and reproductive biology uniqueness.
Assessed: 19 Nov 2009 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2245&SpeciesID=5168&CountryID=151
Nannophrys naeyakai Tribal Rock Frog
Comments: Galloya National Park is an additional protected area. Unknown the status/declining because nobody works on it. Threats seems to be increasing. Species isn’t effectively protected. Threats can’t be changed. The biology is unknown but probably the same as the other Nannophrys, as are the ecological requirements. Local education awareness – only spcies occurring in the dry zone and the importance of not making fires.
Assessed: 19 Nov 2009 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=1734&SpeciesID=3615&CountryID=151
Adenomus dasi Das Dwarf Toad
Comments: Tea plantations are below the distribution of the species and don’t affect the area of the the toad. Research ex situ: reproductive biology unknown. Good species for messaging (100 years ago was common and show how with the plantations affected the populations).
Assessed: 19 Nov 2009 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=5&SpeciesID=2425&CountryID=151
Microhyla zeylanica Sri Lanka Narrow-mouthed Frog
Comments: Fragmentation of populations and surrounded by pesticide «hotspots» and area of occupancy has been reduced. Propose may be Critically Endangered. Mohomad Bahir and Anslem de Silva will provide the information to support the proposal of Critically Endangered (goodwillserve@gmail.com; kalds@slt.lk). Record of arrival of new species of bird predators (egret) in the habitat (new threat).
Assessed: 19 Nov 2009 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=1725&SpeciesID=3&CountryID=151
Adenomus kelaartii Kelaart’s Dwarf Toad
Comments: German researchers published the reproduction biology (comments of being illegally collected). Restricted to pristine clean water streams. Found dead specimens with malformation. Within a protected area there are evidences of decline (Knuckles, Anslem de Silva’s study site (location site for the species). Some of the protected areas suggest populations are stable. Attractive for display and good flagship species. Good education message.
Assessed: 19 Nov 2009 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=7&SpeciesID=2427&CountryID=151
Duttaphrynus kotagamai Kotagama’s toad
Comments: The species still declining
Assessed: 19 Nov 2009 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=586&SpeciesID=4472&CountryID=151
Duttaphrynus noellerti Noellert’s toad
Assessed: 19 Nov 2009 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=597&SpeciesID=4475&CountryID=151
Fejervarya greenii
Comments: Threats are increasing. Trout are also introduced in protected areas and it’s protected! Lots of people working in the area so more capacity to change/reverse the threats. There is an example of reversing the threats in similar conditions and recovering a frog species locally. Agrochemicals are increasing and this threat wasn’t present for the example above.
Assessed: 19 Nov 2009 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=848&SpeciesID=3531&CountryID=151
Fejervarya greenii Sri Lanka Montane Frog
Comments: Threats are increasing. Trout are also introduced in protected areas and it’s protected! Lots of people working in the area so more capacity to change/reverse the threats. There is an example of reversing the threats in similar conditions and recovering a frog species locally. Agrochemicals are increasing and this threat wasn’t present for the example above.
Assessed: 19 Nov 2009 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=849&SpeciesID=3671&CountryID=151
Pseudophilautus caeruleus Blue-thighed Shrub Frog
Assessed: 19 Nov 2009 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2241&SpeciesID=5153&CountryID=151
Pseudophilautus frankenbergi Frankenburg’s Shrub Frog
Comments: Third location known – Adam’s Peak. Mountain cloud forest species (forest specialist). At Namunukula the frog is on private land (tea plantation) and has a high chance of being lost unless the site is protected. Threats continue even within the two protected areas.
Assessed: 19 Nov 2009 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2247&SpeciesID=5171&CountryID=151
-
Anaxyrus houstonensis Houston Toad (Program exists at Houston Zoo)
Comments: Crump/Gluesenkamp – education will be important to get private landowners to help, TPWD student program in place & youth Toad Trackers (Houston Zoo)
Assessed: 26 Oct 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=97&SpeciesID=2481&CountryID=98
Plethodon ainsworthi Bay Springs Salamander, Ainsworth’s Salamander
Comments: Extinct species – but we evaluated it with the understanding that if it reappears; education warranted, if rediscovery; Dodd – distinctive morphologically – elongated and skinny.
Assessed: 26 Oct 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=2073&SpeciesID=1036&CountryID=98
Ambystoma bishopi Reticulated Flatwoods Salamander (Programs exist at Jacksonville Zoo, Atlanta Botanical Garden and San Antonio Zoo)
Comments: May qualify as endangered; Dodd – ongoing studies by Fla F&GC; Dodd – protection is Eglin AFB & Apalachicola WA; Barber – Jacksonville Zoo has plans to reintroduce in future; Dodd/Barrett – threats are climate change (droughts) and no one else is filling breeding ponds (Barrett – mitigation – habitat loss/ increased connectivity/landscape level occupancy/fill ponds). Barrett – so few populations left, expect difficult to resolve issue. Dodd – analog for cingulatum (which is even more critical); Dodd – education (attractiveness, habitat, regional endemic);
Assessed: 26 Oct 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=23&SpeciesID=5494&CountryID=98
Ambystoma californiense California Tiger Salamander (Program exists at Shaffer Lab at UCLA)
Comments: Lannoo – new threat is genetic pollution from introduced tiger salamanders; Gluesenkamp- extirpation includes fish in stock pools; Gluesenkamp mentions that hybridized specimens could be culled from ponds. Gluesenkamp – bred by Brad Schaffer (now at UCLA); Gluesenkamp- «Poster child» for loss of Valley ecosystems.
Assessed: 26 Oct 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=25&SpeciesID=5496&CountryID=98
Ambystoma cingulatum Frosted Flatwoods Salamander (Program exists at Riverbanks Zoo)
Comments: Dodd – possibly extinct in SC/GA, but FL populations known extant in last two years; Barrett – not seen in GA in more than a decade; Bishop is an analog for this species.; All – regional species awareness and threat awareness would be beneficial similar to small range species, Range state approval (Barrett – no in GA, Dodd – FL is ?, and Riverbanks were wild caught, so potentially possible).
Assessed: 26 Oct 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=26&SpeciesID=5497&CountryID=98
Lithobates sevosus Dusky Gopher Frog (Program exists at AZA institutions)
Comments: Hanna – TNC has bought up wetland sites for potential reintroduction; Lannoo – has been challenged for economic reasons for ESA (development); Memphis Zoo translocated some recently; Assisted Reproduction Technology used to produced frogs.
Assessed: 26 Oct 2012 https://www.conservationneeds.org/Assessment/assessment?pageType=results&AssessmentID=1523&SpeciesID=3099&CountryID=98